It’s
almost here. That special Sunday when the nation pauses to celebrate our
collective obsession with competition -- Super Bowl XLVIII, with its Latin
numbers redolent of religion. Followed by two weeks of heated contests that are
the Winter Olympics.
Where
does our competitiveness come from?
Well,
I can tell you about a Saturday morning bike ride I shared with some family
members who had two sons – aged about eight and 10 – along the beautiful Cape
Cod Rail Trail, a bike path that meanders through some 25 miles of mostly
wooded land in Dennis, Eastham and Wellfleet.
At
lunch after our ride, the younger brother was visibly upset. His father – who
happens to have his high school football jersey framed on the family room wall
– asked why.
“I
didn’t finish first,” his son said, his eyes starting to tear.
His
father consoled him. “After lunch we’ll go back and you can win this time.”
Huh?
This poor kid regarded our tranquil bike ride as a competition?
I
know too many people who delight in competitiveness and border on the neurotic
in their drive to finish first in every aspect of their lives – even here in
paradise.
I've always considered this a terribly unhappy way to go through life – needing to
win at everything.
Like
this guy:
“I like to win in everything
I do, regardless of what it is. You want to race down the street, I want to
beat you. If we're playing checkers, I want to win. You beat me, it's going to
bother me. I just enjoy competition.”
Derek
Jeter said it.
But
athletes aren’t the only ones afflicted with near-neurotic competitiveness.
Writers
– even at the top of their game – have waged famous rivalries. Edgar Allan Poe
and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Mary McCarthy and Lillian Hellman. Gore Vidal
and Norman Mailer.
Woody
Allen nailed it in this scene from his 2011 film, Midnight in Paris:
Gil: I would like you to
read my novel and get your opinion.
Ernest Hemingway: I hate it.
Gil: You haven't even read
it yet.
Ernest Hemingway: If it's
bad, I'll hate it. If it's good, then I'll be envious and hate it even more.
You don't want the opinion of another writer.
Karen
Horney, a Freudian who went on to develop Psychoanalytic Social Theory, suggested that modern culture is based on
competition. Everyone is the real or potential competitor of everyone else, she
said, and this competition results in basic hostility.
There might also be a case that competition is the obverse
of ambition.
Blogger
Luke McElroy says competition and ambition are two primary
manifestations of personal motivation -- neither one better than the other, just
different.
Google
Co-Founder Larry Page, for instance, wins by out-performing Microsoft and
Yahoo. Steve Jobs, on the other hand, never worried much about Apple's competition,
but drove himself to be personally better in creating phenomenal products.
It’s
the difference between basketball and swim teams. Both are team sports. But the
basketball team wins by making the other team lose. The swimming team wins by
individuals bettering themselves.
I’m
not sure into which category I fall. I always thought I wasn’t a competitive
person at all.
But
I felt the adrenalin rush of competitiveness as I ran the New
York City Marathon. I wasn’t going to win the race, of course. The Kenyan had
broken the tape long before I reached the 26th mile.
Yet
… the finish line beckoned … and I wanted to beat just the one runner directly in front of me.
And
then the next.
And
the next …
In my next blog, "Making Life Work Best"
I feel the same when running. It's a personal thing to see how far I can push myself. That person ahead is just a goal to achieve. Healthy competition is good but you can't let it consume you.
ReplyDeleteI played dominoes with friends and they got so upset when they lost that it was no fun anymore. So I avoid any offer of a game from them.
Why is it called a game when it is upsetting you? Go figure.